WordPress hosting for people doing the accessibility work.
An audit is only worth what it can be reproduced against. Most hosting quietly makes staging differ from production in exactly the ways that matter.
Everything an accessibility audit asks of a host.
The work is repeatable measurement, and that requires an environment that does not move under you.
Staging that matches production
Same PHP version, same plugin set, same caching behaviour. A staging site with caching disabled behaves differently for exactly the interactions that matter to assistive technology.
Nothing injected into the page
No overlay widget, no accessibility toolbar, no host-added banner. Those tools are contested, and either way it should be your decision rather than something appearing in the markup.
Field data, not lab scores
Layout shift and interaction delay are the vitals that hurt screen reader and keyboard users most, and they are only meaningful measured from real visitors on real connections.
Evidence you keep
Audits produce artefacts. Reports, recordings, VPAT drafts - and those need somewhere durable, not a folder on the laptop of whoever ran the test.
A change rehearsed before it ships
Remediation touches templates and markup, which is exactly the class of change most likely to regress something else. It goes to a clone first.
Reproduce the finding.
The argument that ends most accessibility work is somebody being unable to reproduce a finding on their machine. A faithful environment settles that quickly.
- Staging parity with production, verified
- Field vitals from real visitors
- One-click admin login without shared passwords
- Restore any daily backup from the dashboard
The vitals that assistive tech feels.
Layout shift moves focus out from under a keyboard user. Interaction delay makes a screen reader announce something that has already changed. These are accessibility problems that present as performance numbers.
What we change for accessibility work
These differ from a standard WordPress site on the same plan, and each follows from the work being measurement that has to hold up.
| Setting | What we do | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Staging environment | Matched to production including caching behaviour | A staging copy with caching disabled behaves differently for precisely the interactions assistive technology depends on, so findings there do not transfer. |
| Injected scripts | None added by the platform, ever | Overlay and toolbar widgets are contested at best, and whether to use one has to be the site owner's decision rather than something that appears in the markup. |
| Core Web Vitals | Reported from real visitor traffic rather than synthetic runs | Layout shift and interaction delay affect keyboard and screen reader users most, and a lab run on a fast connection does not show either. |
| Audit artefacts | Stored durably alongside the site | Reports, recordings and VPAT drafts are the evidence, and evidence living on one person's laptop stops being evidence when they leave. |
| Remediation changes | Rehearsed on a clone before release | Accessibility fixes touch templates and markup, which is the change class most likely to regress something unrelated. |
Simple, transparent pricing.
Every plan includes free migration, daily backups, SSL and 24/7 support.
- 1 WordPress site
- 10 GB NVMe disk
- Free SSL
- Daily backups
- One-click deployment
- Support tickets
- 5 WordPress sites
- 50 GB NVMe disk
- Free SSL
- Daily backups
- One-click deployment
- Priority support tickets
- 20 WordPress sites
- 200 GB NVMe disk
- Free SSL
- Daily backups
- One-click deployment
- Dedicated support
Questions, answered.
Do you add an accessibility overlay to sites?
Will staging behave the same as production?
Why does hosting affect accessibility at all?
Can I keep audit evidence with the site?
How do I test a remediation safely?
Do the accessibility work on hosting that does not get in the way.
Free migration, staging that genuinely matches, and nothing injected into your pages.